2026
2026 Carbon Forecast
9 MtCO₂
Projected footprint[↗]
Hottest Tournament
Qatar '22
28°C avg · cooled arenas
Peak CO₂ Rise
+49%
Qatar vs bid baseline[↗]
CO₂ Trend
↑ Rising
Per-tournament average

// A Sustainability Report · 2026 FIFA World Cup · NYU Global Affairs

Global Spectacle
Local
Footprint

A Study Based on the FIFA World Cup — 92 years of tournaments, one warming planet. How climate change has reshaped the beautiful game, and what 2026 looks like against the backdrop of history.

Scroll
Qatar 2022 · +49% CO₂ vs bid baseline[↗] Avg host-city temp risen +1.4°C since 1930 · Berkeley Earth[↗] Brazil 2014 — FIFA's first cooling breaks · 32°C+ in Manaus Germany 2006 — first carbon-tracked World Cup[↗] 2026 spans 3 countries · 16 cities · 48 teams South Africa 2010 — first official FIFA carbon offset program[↗] Mexico 1970 — noon kick-offs in 31°C heat for TV 2026 projected footprint: ~92% higher than 2010–2022 average[↗] Qatar 2022 · +49% CO₂ vs bid baseline[↗] Avg host-city temp risen +1.4°C since 1930 · Berkeley Earth[↗] Brazil 2014 — FIFA's first cooling breaks · 32°C+ in Manaus Germany 2006 — first carbon-tracked World Cup[↗] 2026 spans 3 countries · 16 cities · 48 teams South Africa 2010 — first official FIFA carbon offset program[↗] Mexico 1970 — noon kick-offs in 31°C heat for TV 2026 projected footprint: ~92% higher than 2010–2022 average[↗]

Why Climate &
Football Matter

The FIFA World Cup is the most-watched sporting event on Earth — drawing over 5 billion viewers and reshaping the infrastructure, energy grids, and carbon footprint of an entire nation for years. As the planet warms, these tournaments are increasingly held under conditions that would have been unthinkable decades ago.

This report traces every World Cup from Uruguay 1930 to Qatar 2022 — mapping temperature anomalies, CO₂ changes, and the key climate moments that defined each era. Then it turns the lens on 2026, when the expanded 48-team tournament spans three countries across North America.

All data is sourced from the Global Carbon Project, Berkeley Earth, IPCC AR6, and FIFA official records. See full sources →

Enter the Museum → Explore Climate Map →
Temp Rise Since '30
+1.4°C
Host-city average[↗]
Hottest Tournament
Qatar '22
28°C avg · air-cooled
Peak CO₂ Rise
+49%
Qatar vs bid baseline
Best CO₂ Record
+2%
France 1998
2026 Host Nations
3
USA · Canada · Mexico
Teams in 2026
48
Largest ever format

Our Three
Core Claims

01

Heat Risk
Is Rising

Future summer World Cups will face significantly higher heat-related risks. Host cities in Spain, Portugal, and Morocco by 2030 will regularly experience WBGT levels exceeding safe thresholds for strenuous exercise — mirroring conditions that required special measures in 2014 and 2022.

WBGT
Threshold exceeded in 2030s models[↗]
02

Emissions
Are Exploding

The expansion and multi-host format of modern World Cups dramatically increases carbon footprints, raising doubts about sustainability claims. The 48-team, multi-national 2026 World Cup will generate nearly double the emissions of recent 32-team editions — international air travel being the dominant factor.

+92%
2026 vs 2010–2022 avg · projected[↗]
03
⚖️

Offsets
Fall Short

Current offset and mitigation strategies will be insufficient or lack integrity. The World Cup's carbon footprint could undermine global climate goals. Business-as-usual planning carries high risk — reconceptualizing what a "viable" World Cup looks like under climate change is urgent and necessary.

9 MtCO₂e
2026 projected footprint[↗]

How We
Measure Impact

This research combines climate risk assessment with sustainable event management — viewing each World Cup as a system exposed to external climate hazards and generating measurable environmental impacts.

// Step 01

Climate Risk
Assessment

Risk = Hazard × Exposure × Vulnerability. Hazard is extreme heat, exposure includes players and fans, vulnerability involves preparedness and cooling measures. WBGT and UTCI metrics quantify heat stress probabilities.

Heat Risk · WBGT · UTCI
// Step 02

Carbon Footprint
Lifecycle Analysis

Scope 1 (direct on-site), Scope 2 (energy for venues), and Scope 3 (indirect: travel and construction). The tournament is modeled as a set of travel flows and infrastructure investments quantified in CO₂e terms.

LCA · Scope 1–3 · CO₂e
// Step 03

Historical Data
Comparison

For repeat host nations (e.g. Mexico 1970 vs. 1986), we compare across tournaments. For first-time hosts, we compare CO₂ from bid year to tournament year — e.g. Russia won bid in 2010, hosted in 2018.

Global Carbon Project[↗] · Berkeley Earth[↗]
// Step 04

Mitigation
Hierarchy

First reducing emissions at source, then replacing high-carbon options, then offsetting as a last resort. We critically evaluate the gap between "carbon neutral" claims and actual climate impact of past tournaments.

Policy · FIFA · IPCC AR6[↗]

The Heat Is
Undeniable

Average match-day temperatures across all World Cup host cities have risen consistently since the 1970s. The trend is recorded history, backed by Berkeley Earth's station-based analysis.

+1.4°C
Avg rise since 1930[↗]
31°C
Hottest avg · Mexico '70
12°C
Coolest avg · S.Africa '10
See Full Climate Data →

Significance of
This Study

01

Practical Impact
for Policymakers

Concrete climate risk indicators for upcoming World Cups give FIFA and host governments a scientific basis for scheduling, venue design, and player safety protocols. Modern planning assumes a stable climate — our analysis shows this is an increasingly dangerous assumption.

02

Environmental
Accountability

An independent assessment of true tournament emissions and the effectiveness of mitigation strategies. If multi-country formats emit substantially more, this should influence how FIFA approaches future bids — moving beyond broad pledges to evidence-backed measures.

03

Public Awareness
& Academic Value

Sport is a highly visible lens for climate impacts. When the World Cup adapts, billions take notice. This research adds to scholarly literature on climate resilience of mega-events — offering a methodology applicable to other global sporting events.

Explore the Full Report
Museum of World Cups
// Page 02
Museum of World Cups
Fun facts, records, and climate milestones from every tournament — including the World Cup with the most tourists, the hottest edition, and the largest CO₂ shift from bid to hosting year.
Enter Museum
Climate Map
// Page 03
Climate Map
Interactive world map of all World Cup host nations. Click any country to see who won, key climate facts, average temperatures, and host country population at tournament time.
Explore Map
Climate data
// Page 04
Climate Data
CO₂ emissions, temperature change, and fan attendance by host country. Select any nation and compare data across years — from the bid announcement to the final whistle.
View Data
Recommendations
// Page 05
Recommendations
Evidence-based proposals for a more sustainable World Cup — including how renewable technology should be implemented to curb climate change in future tournaments.
Read Recommendations
Sources
// Page 06
Sources & Citations
Every data point cited with full attribution — global carbon data, temperature records, FIFA statistics, peer-reviewed research, and our complete hypothesis and methodology.
View Sources
About the Authors
// Page 07
About the Authors
Two NYU Global Affairs students united by football and climate. Read about Daniel and Tarun — their backgrounds, motivations, and the shared conviction that sport can drive climate action.
Meet the Authors
Note

Methodology note: CO₂ figures represent percentage change in host nation emissions from bid announcement year to tournament year (Global Carbon Project[↗], 2023 release). For repeat hosts (e.g. Mexico 1970 & 1986), emissions are compared across both tournaments. Temperature anomalies are relative to the 1951–1980 baseline for each host city (Berkeley Earth[↗], 2024). 2026 projections use IPCC AR6 SSP2-4.5 regional models[↗]. View full sources →